Zapier Passes 9,000 Integrations, Widens Lead Over Rivals

Zapier's integration directory has passed 9,000 apps — up from 7,000+ — widening an already cavernous gap between it and every other no-code automation platform. Our verdict on Zapier hasn't changed: it stays conditional. The integration moat is real and growing, but per-task pricing still punishes high-volume automation.

What happened

Zapier now lists 9,000+ app integrations on its public directory (Zapier(opens in new tab), 2026), a roughly 28% increase from the 7,000+ figure it previously carried on its tagline. The milestone coincides with Zapier's consolidation of its product suite — Agents, Chatbots, MCP, SDK, Canvas, Tables, and Forms — under a unified task-based pricing model where every product draws from the same task pool.

The growth reflects two compounding forces: new premium app partnerships with major SaaS vendors, and the continued expansion of Zapier's developer platform, which lets third parties build and publish integrations directly into the ecosystem. At this pace, Zapier is adding roughly 2,000 integrations per major cycle.

Why it matters

App count is Zapier's core competitive moat — and it keeps getting wider.

At 9,000+ integrations, Zapier's library is roughly 3x Make's 3,000+ and over 20x n8n's 400+. For non-technical teams that need a pre-built connector for nearly any SaaS tool — from obscure CRMs to niche marketing platforms — nothing else comes close. This is why Zapier remains the default answer for marketing teams, founders, and operations people who want to connect apps without writing code.

But breadth isn't everything. Our directory rates Zapier conditional for a reason: when your Agents, Chatbots, and Zaps all draw from the same task pool, volume automation gets expensive fast. n8n's self-hosted Community plan is free with unlimited workflows, and Make is rolling out credit-based pricing that often lands cheaper for medium-scale operations.

What changes for you

Already on Zapier? Nothing breaks. The 9,000 milestone and unified pricing are evolutionary — your Zaps keep running, and you now have more apps to connect to.

Evaluating automation platforms? The decision still comes down to what you value most.

• Choose Zapier if integration breadth is your primary criterion. No other platform comes close to 9,000+ pre-built connectors, and the developer ecosystem means the library keeps growing.
• Choose n8n if you need self-hosting, AI-native workflows, or want to avoid per-task pricing. We run n8n in production and it handles our AI agent pipelines reliably at zero marginal cost.
• Choose Make if you need complex branching logic, visual scenario design, or GDPR-compliant EU data centers — and 3,000+ integrations covers your stack.

FAQ

Does 9,000 integrations change Zapier's pricing problem?

No. The per-task economics remain unchanged. Professional plans start at $19.99/month for 2,000 tasks (Zapier(opens in new tab), 2025), and your Agents, Chatbots, and Zaps all draw from the same pool. At high volume, this gets expensive relative to n8n's flat-rate self-hosted model or Make's credit-based pricing.

Should I switch from Make or n8n to Zapier for the integrations?

Only if you've hit a wall — a critical app you need simply doesn't exist on your current platform and you've confirmed it's on Zapier. The migration cost of rebuilding automations usually outweighs the benefit of a broader library unless you're actively blocked.

Will Zapier hit 10,000 integrations?

Almost certainly, and likely within 12 months. The pace of new additions — roughly 2,000 per major cycle — combined with the developer platform flywheel makes 10,000 a question of when, not if.