Financial services
Coding agents your change-control process can live with
Fintech, banking and funds engineering teams want the speed of coding agents without losing the review trail. These workshops build the gates, hooks and tests that keep it.
In a regulated engineering team, a coding agent is only useful if you can answer one question afterwards: who checked this change, against what, and where is the proof? Most teams that hand developers Claude Code cannot answer it. Each developer's agent has its own settings, the shared instructions file is too long to follow, and the agent reports done on its own word.
The workshops below replace that with things you can show: a written list of standards locked before the work starts, a reviewer agent that checks every diff against that list, a hook that blocks the commands your policies forbid, and a regression suite in CI the agent cannot skip.
Outcomes
What your team will be able to do
- Block the commands your change-control policy forbids, with the reason in the block message.
- Lock the applicable standards before an agent starts, and review every diff against them.
- Keep a trail of what each agent changed, who approved it and which checks ran.
- Run a regression suite in CI that an agent cannot mark green by skipping it.
- Roll one agent setup out to every developer through a single reviewed merge request.
Start here: Claude Code for Teams builds the shared setup, the blocking hook and the reviewer agent on your repo.
Then: Testing AI Agents adds evals, a regression suite and a done-gate, the evidence a risk or audit team asks for.
When one agent is not enough: Build Your AI Agent Team splits work across specialist agents with approval points you control.
Local dates and prices: Ireland in euro, United Kingdom in pounds.
FAQ
Questions
Does code from our systems have to leave our environment?
No. You work in your own environment and share your screen only when you choose. If company code cannot be shown at all, Neomanex provides a sample repo so every exercise still runs.
Is this compliance training?
No. It is engineering training. You build the controls (hooks, reviewer agents, CI gates) that make agent work reviewable. Your compliance team decides what the policies are; the workshop shows how to enforce them in the agent setup.
Which workshop should a regulated team take first?
Claude Code for Teams. It gives every developer the same setup and the review agent. Testing AI Agents comes next, once the setup is in place.